Skip to content
Explore strategies, reviews, and community insights for car…

The Most Disappointing Games of 2025, Per Aggregate Scores

Across the internet, gamers are quick to share their rankings of the top games of 2025. Yet, where are the flops, the low achievers? Let's take a few moments to honor the most panned games of the year, based on the aggregate scores from Metacritic. Is every one of these games as bad as the ratings suggest? Here is the list.

10. Switch 2's Welcome Tour

Aggregate Score: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this tech demo were heavily influenced by its $9.99 price tag, with many feeling cheesed off it wasn't a free pack-in like similar console launches. Professional assessment was quite mixed, from "crushing disappointment" to more generous appraisals that praised the charming software underneath the controversy. Despite the grumbling, the title proved to be a notable digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 3.2/10

Presented as "beyond a racing game," this driving sim from European developers garnered pretty unanimous reviews. Reviews pointed out that the game fell short in nearly every way, especially in a year packed with excellent racing games. In the eyes of critics, this disappointing sim was advised to be left on the shelf.

8. The Purrfect Bubsy Collection

Metascore: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

Before we start: the awkward title grammar is a minor strike against it. This collection of 1990s-era Bubsy titles features a sarcastic feline known for constant jokes. Critics observed that these games haven't aged well in their time and feel dated with age. The surprisingly strong user score is a peculiar anomaly to the Metascore.

7. Hunter x Hunter Fighting Game

Aggregate Score: 53, User Score: 3.5

This anime-inspired brawler was met with harsh criticism from both professionals and fans. Complaints centered on a thin roster of characters and a severe lack of content. Player sentiment was especially harsh, with some voicing a desire that the title's failure would be a warning for similar releases.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, User Score: 5.3

Hailing from the quirky Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this bike-riding title tasks players with gathering slime-like creatures. The assessment was that its effort to mimic a *Katamari Damacy*-like feel was unsuccessful, coming across as more of a quick spin-off than a meaningful addition to the franchise. Its brief runtime combined with a premium price was criticized.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, User Score: 5.3

This title is a curious artifact from the past, launched after a very long time in legal limbo. The team behind it opted to release the game as an period-accurate artifact of its time, acknowledging that contemporary players might criticize its dated design. As such, many reviews remarked that the interesting history of its development was more compelling than the game itself.

4. Scar-Lead

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 2.4

This anime-styled third-person shooter modeled after games like *Returnal* disappointed with critics. Common complaints were uninspired foes, monotonous stage design, and a snoozy narrative. A controversial mechanic involving the character's attire was seen as adding nothing and undermined the game's enjoyment.

3. Ambulance Life

Metascore: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Imagine the strategic medical sims of the past, then strip away the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is essentially *Ambulance Life*. Players found the ambulance-driving sequences to be a slog, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being insensitive. The overall experience was deemed largely unsatisfying.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, User Score: 5.8

This departure from the classic virtual pet formula transforms the franchise into a shopping simulation title. The result, according to critics, was a unsatisfying assortment of basic activities that rapidly became boring. Some reviews went so far as to call it one of the worst titles available on its platform, noting a profound lack of depth.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, Audience Score: 2.5

Positioned as a high-profile GTA-style title from a studio led by experienced developers, *MindsEye* was a notable commercial failure. Reviews universally panned its lousy combat, uninspired storytelling, and a plethora of game-breaking glitches. Critics found it to be a downgrade compared to much older games in the action genre. Despite the scathing reviews, a small handful of optimistic players found value in the experience, providing a distinct counterpoint.

The writer

Kurt Thornton

A passionate card game strategist and writer, sharing expert tips and engaging stories to enhance your gaming experience.

Infinite Deck Play HQ

Type to search articles.