🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I usually steered clear of extensive use of chance during my D&D games. My preference was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice rather than the roll of a die. That said, I opted to alter my method, and I'm incredibly pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Observing 'Luck Rolls'

A popular podcast utilizes a DM who frequently asks for "chance rolls" from the participants. He does this by choosing a type of die and defining consequences contingent on the number. It's at its core no distinct from rolling on a random table, these are devised spontaneously when a course of events has no predetermined resolution.

I decided to try this method at my own session, primarily because it looked interesting and provided a break from my usual habits. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing balance between pre-determination and spontaneity in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable In-Game Example

In a recent session, my group had survived a massive battle. When the dust settled, a player asked about two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. In place of choosing an outcome, I handed it over to chance. I asked the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both would perish; on a 5-9, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This resulted in a deeply emotional moment where the party discovered the corpses of their friends, still clasped together in death. The cleric conducted funeral rites, which was especially significant due to prior story developments. In a concluding touch, I improvised that the NPCs' bodies were strangely transformed, showing a enchanted item. By chance, the bead's contained spell was perfectly what the group needed to address another major story problem. You simply script such serendipitous moments.

Improving Your Improvisation

This event caused me to question if improvisation and spontaneity are actually the essence of D&D. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Adventurers reliably excel at ignoring the best constructed plots. Therefore, a skilled DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and invent details in the moment.

Using on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these abilities without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The trick is to use them for low-stakes situations that have a limited impact on the overarching story. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to decide if the king's advisor is a traitor. But, I would consider using it to decide whether the party reach a location moments before a major incident occurs.

Strengthening Player Agency

This technique also works to keep players engaged and create the impression that the game world is alive, progressing based on their actions in real-time. It combats the feeling that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby bolstering the cooperative foundation of roleplaying.

This approach has always been integral to the original design. Original D&D were enamored with random tables, which fit a game focused on treasure hunting. Even though contemporary D&D frequently prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the best approach.

Finding the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with thorough preparation. Yet, it's also fine no problem with stepping back and letting the dice to guide minor details instead of you. Control is a big aspect of a DM's job. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to cede it, at times when doing so might improve the game.

The core recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of control. Experiment with a little randomness for smaller outcomes. You might just find that the surprising result is far more memorable than anything you could have pre-written in advance.